Costa Mesa
City Hall has issued a press release telling us the City will have a surplus of
at least $6 million this year. The press
release also asserts that “Over the past four fiscal years, the city’s budget
surpluses have added up [emphasis added] to $19.4
million.”
So our General Fund should really be growing, right? We don’t have audited numbers yet for the
2013-2014 Fiscal Year, but the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (here) show less than a $5 million increase from 2010 to 2013.
This shows a decrease in the General fund from 2012 to
2013.
Sometimes money is transferred
between different City funds. Let’s
look at the balance in all of our government funds.
Hmmm. There’s a drop
in total fund balance from 2012 to 2013, too.
With all those surpluses, our fund balance should be well on
the way to pre-recession levels. Then
why have our assets crept up so little?
We did take a loss due to closure of the Redevelopment
Agency. The City Council had little to
no control over that.
On the other
hand, the Council majority is crowing about revenue increases over which they
had had little to no control, either.
If they want to own the up side, then they need to own the down side as
well.
Where did the “up side” come from? Obviously, a big factor was the recovering
economy. City budgets show that annual sales tax revenue
increased from $34.6 million in FY 2009-2010 to $45.8 million in FY 2012-2013.
In addition, Costa Mesa voters approved an increase in the
hotel tax in November 2010, the same election which put our current Mayor in
office. Just the increase in the hotel
tax rate brought in a little under $4 million over 2010-2013, with additional
increases due to the economy.
We also got over $5 million from narcotics asset seizures from
2011-2013. Since it takes a few years
for the Feds to process these funds, we may still have a little of that trickling
in from past seizures, but with our decimated Police Department don’t expect to
see much of that generated in the future.
Speaking of decimation, we also got a couple million as our
share of the assets remaining in the now-defunct helicopter program.
Wow with all that money coming in, Costa Mesa should be
rolling in dough. Our reserves should be
way up, shouldn’t they?
Sure, if the City didn’t spend the surplus. In November of 2013, also before the audit
was released, the City began making plans for spending the “FY 2012-2013 surplus
of $7.1 million”. Ultimately a spending plan for $5.5 million of the surplus
was adopted.
At the same time, proposed spending for Fiscal Year
2013-2014 was increased by a $1.568 million.
That means “extra” money at the end of 2013-2014 includes a carryover of
the “extra” $1.568 million from 2012-2013.
Has anything else been double counted?
We do know one thing that isn’t counted in the overall
figures for government fund balance—decreases in the self insurance fund recently analyzed by Anna
Vrska (link).
3 comments:
Did you condense this info. for a DP article?
Gently scathing! good work, Sandy!
As an aside, good ol' Martin Millard has peed in the soup -- he likes the flavor better that way.
Hey, didja notice that 1.568 million plus 5.5 million adds up to 7.1 million? (7.068, rounded off.) Doesn't that sound a whole lot like the exact amount of the surplus?
I think Righeimer needs to re-do third grade, where they failed to teach him to add with his shoes on.
Post a Comment